-
-
Yes, i have had him moult whilst i've had the T, just the once, but his remains are looking rather worse for wear now!Originally posted by wesley flower View Post
Hi Eric, In your opinion, which Sericopelma would you take a stab at?Originally posted by Eric Reynolds View Post
Hi Ray, And Thanks for the input! Come on Which Sericopelma do you believe it to be??Originally posted by Ray Gabriel View PostYep same for me its a Sericopelma sp (i know which one but not saying yet
Ray
Hi, and Thanks Lisa!Originally posted by Lisa Baines View PostBest move i ever made was moving onto the BTS forum. and another scorpion based forum because i have met some wonderful private breeders so i doubt i will ever buy from a 'local' shop again
and hope you get ya little beauty filly ID'd. It is gorgeous
Which paper? forgive me i'm very inquisitive! lol.Originally posted by Ray Gabriel View Post wait for the paper 
Ray
Regards, Joel.Comment
-
When the likes of Mr. Gabriel are secretive....it's normally worth waiting for !!!!Originally posted by Joel Tipler View Post
Bide your time JoelDon't forget to learn what you can, when you can, where you can.
Please Support CB Grammostola :- Act Now To Secure The Future
Comment
-
It's hard though! I'm excited to actually find out what the little beauty is!Originally posted by Colin D Wilson View PostWhen the likes of Mr. Gabriel are secretive....it's normally worth waiting for !!!!
Bide your time Joel
Joel.Comment
-
Well Joel,
I'm almost certain its Sericopelma rubronitens. The pics of them I've seen are identical to your specimen.
Sorry if I ruined anyones surprise LOL!!!
Michael..2xB.vagans, B.smithi, 2x L.parahybana, L.polycuspulatus, G.aureostriata, C.fasciatum, B.albopilosum, B.boehmei, P.pulcher, H.maculata, C.crawshayi, L.violaceopes, C.cyanopubescens, 3xP.irminia, 2xP.murinus RCF, 2xP.cambridgei, C.fimbriatus, C.schioedtei, A.pupurea, A.azuraklassi, A.versicolor, H.lividum, P.reduncus.Comment
-
If you're basing that conclusion solely on the pics you've seen, then you shouldn't be "almost certain"!Originally posted by michaelmckinney View Post Ask the owners of the pics how then know it's S. rubronitens. Most will probably say that's what they bought it as. It is common to see the OP's spider sold as such... BUT, this doesn't mean they've actually been ID'd reliably as that species.
There are likely things Ray is not comfortable commenting on publicly at this time, until work gets published.
EricComment
-
I agree who compared thier specimens with the types (as i have most of them here LOL), worst thing is (apart from getting excel working again and a few other bits to tidy up) I have to wait for 2 other papers to be published first before this oneOriginally posted by Eric Reynolds View PostIf you're basing that conclusion solely on the pics you've seen, then you shouldn't be "almost certain"! Ask the owners of the pics how then know it's S. rubronitens. Most will probably say that's what they bought it as. It is common to see the OP's spider sold as such... BUT, this doesn't mean they've actually been ID'd reliably as that species.
There are likely things Ray is not comfortable commenting on publicly at this time, until work gets published.
Eric wont be long though
Mean time i sugest you try him with any of the red and black Sericopelma sp sold as S. rubronitens.
He is one of the 3 Panamanian species
RayComment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, please register with your real full name as per the rules and regulations, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Tweet
Comment