If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, please register with your real full name as per the rules and regulations,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
just thought i'd share incase you're interested.!!!
Sky ch Eden 532 at 1pm
(eden also has a +1)
'A Woman's Prayer:
Dear Lord, I pray for: Wisdom, To understand a man , to Love and to forgive him , and for patience, For his moods. Because Lord, if I pray for Strength I'll just beat him to death'
Well I thought that was very informative...even if it was concentrating on Australian sp. Would've liked to have seen some comparisons with old world T's...
I saw this thread just in time this afternoon and taped it. Doubt if I'll be able to get my hands on the remote tonight though. Damn soaps! Was it worth watching?
Well I thought that was very informative...even if it was concentrating on Australian sp. Would've liked to have seen some comparisons with old world T's...
I saw this thread just in time this afternoon and taped it. Doubt if I'll be able to get my hands on the remote tonight though. Damn soaps! Was it worth watching?
It's a good program. Amongst other things, it shows Robert Raven collecting and identifying a new species (C. tropix), although I think a fair bit more work might have gone into it than was shown by the program
Ive always considered Australia to be New World as its outside the mapped world prior to finding the Americas. The Old World being Europe, Asia and Africa, the lands attached and the islands.
Are you suggesting that Australian Ts and descendants of Old World species eg. Selonocosmia?
Talking of which, don't some Australian theraphosids have taxonomical links to species from Indonesia or New Guinea?
i belive so, along with malaysia and other southern asian countries. i belive that Selonocosmia are among the taxonomicly linked species Peter.
my tarantulas 001 A. seemani 010 A. avicularia 001 B. auratum 001 B. smithi 001 C. bechaunicus 100 C. huahini 001 C. cyaneopubescens 001 C. crawshayi 002 E. murinus 112 G. rosea 010 H. albostriatum 010 H. lividum 001 H. maculata 001 L. violaceopes 001 L. parahybana 100 N. chromatus 010 P. cancerides 001 P. fasciata 010 P. rufilata 001 P. striata 001 P. cambridgei 010 P. irminia001 P. murinus 001 P. lugardi 001 S. calceata 001 T. violaceus
Its sadly more complicated than that. Selenocosmia is a family name which has included mistakenly other families for a long time. An example of this is S. crassipes, now correctly restored to Phlogius. I was thinking of Coremiocnemis. I was wondering about the link between tropix and valida. As there is a relationship between O. aureotibialis and a dwarf species from Koh Samui, I was wondering if the same was the same between tropix and one or more of its Asian cousins? Also if anyone has any copies of taxonomical/revision papers for O. sp. koh Samui or any Coremiocnemis sp., could I please have a copy? Many thanks.
sigpicHate is for people who find thinking a little too complicated!
Its sadly more complicated than that. Selenocosmia is a family name which has included mistakenly other families for a long time. An example of this is S. crassipes, now correctly restored to Phlogius. I was thinking of Coremiocnemis. I was wondering about the link between tropix and valida. As there is a relationship between O. aureotibialis and a dwarf species from Koh Samui, I was wondering if the same was the same between tropix and one or more of its Asian cousins? Also if anyone has any copies of taxonomical/revision papers for O. sp. koh Samui or any Coremiocnemis sp., could I please have a copy? Many thanks.
Phlogius is still a junior synonym of Selenocosmia at the moment Nicola. No publications from Dr. Raven so far (I don't think), so technically they're all still Selenocosmia
Phlogius is still a junior synonym of Selenocosmia at the moment Nicola. No publications from Dr. Raven so far (I don't think), so technically they're all still Selenocosmia
Well thats cleared it up this end, the ATA seem to be leaning toward Phlogius in recent posts, and i must admit i was about to change labels as i thought (ignorantly) that this was published.
Shall we email "Sir" and pester him to produce a paper it's not like he has much to do really eh
Don't forget to learn what you can, when you can, where you can.
Comment